<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Consultants &#8211; Homework Pays Off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joergweishaupt.com/seo/white-hat/seo-consulatants-homework-pays-off.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joergweishaupt.com/seo/white-hat/seo-consulatants-homework-pays-off.html</link>
	<description>Online Marketing, SEO and Digital Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 12:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: seo experts</title>
		<link>http://www.joergweishaupt.com/seo/white-hat/seo-consulatants-homework-pays-off.html/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>seo experts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joergweishaupt.com/?p=128#comment-599</guid>
		<description>Too good, just excellent quality. Thank you very much for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too good, just excellent quality. Thank you very much for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joerg Weishaupt</title>
		<link>http://www.joergweishaupt.com/seo/white-hat/seo-consulatants-homework-pays-off.html/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Joerg Weishaupt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joergweishaupt.com/?p=128#comment-26</guid>
		<description>You are correct Steve, the quality of the link is just as important as the quantity.  If you launch a link campaign, and your target is only quality sites which carry a good reputation with Google, then you have little to worry about especially if you&#039;re a new site.

It can become an issue if you&#039;re a business owner with a website that has been around for a while showing generic, gradual growth that suddenly explodes.  Google and other major search engines frown on &quot;bought&quot; links.  It is possible to have the weight of your links disregarded if done too quickly.  While Google doesn&#039;t have a sentry standing guard for every site to make sure you aren&#039;t cheating the system - and I agree that it&#039;s not extremely common to get slapped by them for having a raging campaign - in many instances it&#039;s always better to play it safe and make sure that your link building campaign will show gradual steps in organic traffic.

While it may be uncommon to get blacklisted in Google for running a rapid link campaign (more common if its spammy), you can rest assured that if you post quality links and have a gradual increase in traffic it will never happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct Steve, the quality of the link is just as important as the quantity.  If you launch a link campaign, and your target is only quality sites which carry a good reputation with Google, then you have little to worry about especially if you&#8217;re a new site.</p>
<p>It can become an issue if you&#8217;re a business owner with a website that has been around for a while showing generic, gradual growth that suddenly explodes.  Google and other major search engines frown on &#8220;bought&#8221; links.  It is possible to have the weight of your links disregarded if done too quickly.  While Google doesn&#8217;t have a sentry standing guard for every site to make sure you aren&#8217;t cheating the system &#8211; and I agree that it&#8217;s not extremely common to get slapped by them for having a raging campaign &#8211; in many instances it&#8217;s always better to play it safe and make sure that your link building campaign will show gradual steps in organic traffic.</p>
<p>While it may be uncommon to get blacklisted in Google for running a rapid link campaign (more common if its spammy), you can rest assured that if you post quality links and have a gradual increase in traffic it will never happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Diamond</title>
		<link>http://www.joergweishaupt.com/seo/white-hat/seo-consulatants-homework-pays-off.html/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Diamond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 03:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joergweishaupt.com/?p=128#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Hi, Joerg. Excellent primer on the distinction between white hat and black hat SEO. I wonder, though, whether you may be exaggerating the dangers of rapid inbound link building. In my experience I haven&#039;t seen sites banned for this, at least not well established ones. They may have a drop in their ranking, but it ordinarily is temporary. It isn&#039;t a permanent ban.

In my view the surest way to get delisted is to post tons of spammy content on your site, not so much in offsite links. 

When you consider it, the scenario you painted, if it were strictly true, would enable any jealous competitor to sabotage an existing site&#039;s ranking simply by hiring black hat SEO practitioners to do their worst. Imagine the lawsuits that Google would be embroiled in if there were documented instances of this happening! Do you know of any?

Please don&#039;t interpret my remarks as condoning or encouraging black hat practices. I don&#039;t. But I don&#039;t think the consequences of rapid link building are as dire as you suggest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Joerg. Excellent primer on the distinction between white hat and black hat SEO. I wonder, though, whether you may be exaggerating the dangers of rapid inbound link building. In my experience I haven&#8217;t seen sites banned for this, at least not well established ones. They may have a drop in their ranking, but it ordinarily is temporary. It isn&#8217;t a permanent ban.</p>
<p>In my view the surest way to get delisted is to post tons of spammy content on your site, not so much in offsite links. </p>
<p>When you consider it, the scenario you painted, if it were strictly true, would enable any jealous competitor to sabotage an existing site&#8217;s ranking simply by hiring black hat SEO practitioners to do their worst. Imagine the lawsuits that Google would be embroiled in if there were documented instances of this happening! Do you know of any?</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t interpret my remarks as condoning or encouraging black hat practices. I don&#8217;t. But I don&#8217;t think the consequences of rapid link building are as dire as you suggest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; SEO Consulatants – Homework Pays Off &#124; Joerg Weishaupt</title>
		<link>http://www.joergweishaupt.com/seo/white-hat/seo-consulatants-homework-pays-off.html/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; SEO Consulatants – Homework Pays Off &#124; Joerg Weishaupt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joergweishaupt.com/?p=128#comment-18</guid>
		<description>[...] More:  SEO Consulatants – Homework Pays Off &#124; Joerg Weishaupt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More:  SEO Consulatants – Homework Pays Off | Joerg Weishaupt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

